The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to move forward with @DHSgov’s expanded voter citizenship verification system while the legal fight continues. The Court granted the administration’s emergency request to stay a lower court ruling that blocked changes to DHS’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements — or SAVE — program. States will continue to use thru the midterms, Fontes and his ilk are freaking out that the unqualified registrants will be taken off the rolls. Arizona Senate President Warren Petersen and House Speaker Steve Montenegro filed an amicus brief supporting DHS's request to restore SAVE. Now the Social Security information and other federal database can be used to verify citizenship, residency. .
Adrian Fontes is lying. Secretary Fontes blamed the DOJ for more than a year of missing federal felony reports. I spoke with DOJ officials directly who have confirmed that all reports through the first quarter of 2026 have been previously provided to the AzSOS. Additionally, in response to my release, the DOJ sent the files for the second quarter of 2026 to the SOS this morning. By law, the DOJ can only provided these files to the Secretary of State. Secretary Fontes now needs to provide those reports to the County Recorders so we can ensure felons are not permitted to vote in this comming election.

Sep 25, 2026 · 4:49 PM UTC

7
67
196
4,945
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
@AZSecretary better get moving. Efforts to stall must be treated and prosecuted as obstruction @AAGDhillon
1
3
50
The Recorders do removal. They have the tools they need. Fontes attempts to stall this by system functions issues... but after speaking to several of them, it is very apparent they are "tired of his shit".
1
2
23
ARREST CORRUPT CARTEL Fontes🐀‼️‼️
3
6
91
But the opinion warns against ‘mass purges’ because ‘too late’, so only one by one removals, because Dems were able to drag this decision within “weeks” of the election, therefore, no significant changes can be made. When NV cleaned the rolls this fall, it was 400,000 voters . . . How long would it take to individually remove that many, county by county of an average swing state? That the Democrat math.
Nevada Axes Nearly 400,000 Voter Records from Active Rolls — Democrats’ 87,000-Voter Lead Collapses to Just 672 | Jim Hoft, The Gateway Pundit This is stunning. The Democrat Party’s once-dominant voter-registration advantage in Nevada has been virtually erased following an enormous statewide voter-roll cleanup. Six years ago, Democrats enjoyed an advantage of roughly 87,000 active registered voters and treated the Silver State like a permanent blue stronghold. Today, Democrats are hanging onto a statewide lead of just 672 voters. New figures released by Democrat Secretary of State Francisco “Cisco” Aguilar show Nevada’s active voter rolls dropped 50,130 in August alone after routine list maintenance. Nevada now has 2,062,136 active registered voters: - 796,805 are Nonpartisan (38.64%); - 569,337 are Democrats (27.61%); - 568,665 are Republicans (27.58%); - 82,903 are members of the Independent American Party (4.02%); - 13,620 are members of the Libertarian Party of Nevada (0.66%); and - 30,806 are members of other minor political parties (1.49%). Of the 426,577 inactive registered voters in Nevada: - 196,289 are Nonpartisan (46.01%); - 105,481 are Democrats (24.73%); - 91,185 are Republicans (21.38%); - 19,770 are members of the Independent American Party (4.63%); - 4,416 are members of the Libertarian Party of Nevada (1.04%); and - 9,436 are members of other minor political parties (2.21%). Democrats now hold just 569,337 active registrations to Republicans’ 568,665, a microscopic lead of 672 names. That is two-hundredths of one percent. Nonpartisan voters remain the largest political bloc in Nevada, representing 38.64 percent of the active electorate. The August decline reportedly resulted largely from routine voter-list maintenance conducted before the National Voter Registration Act’s 90-day pre-election quiet period. But the latest reduction follows an even larger cleanup conducted across Nevada’s 17 counties. From January 1, 2025, through January 7, 2026, county election officials canceled 176,928 voter registrations and placed another 138,367 registrations on inactive status. That amounts to 315,295 registration-status changes in just over one year. Combined with the latest 50,130-voter decline in active registrations, the two rounds represent approximately 365,000 registration changes or reductions—nearly 400,000. For accuracy, voters designated inactive have not been permanently removed and remain eligible to vote. However, they will no longer automatically receive mail-in ballots. Under federal law, inactive registrations may eventually be canceled if the voter fails to respond to an address-confirmation notice and does not vote in two consecutive federal general elections. Still, the political ramifications are enormous. Nevada Democrats’ once-formidable registration firewall has been obliterated. As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Democrats held a 96,875-voter registration advantage in December 2020. By April 2024, that lead had already fallen to 55,116. The collapse continued through the 2024 election, when President Donald Trump shattered the Democrat Party’s grip on the Silver State and defeated Kamala Harris by 46,008 votes. Trump received 751,205 votes, compared with 705,197 for Harris, becoming the first Republican presidential nominee to carry Nevada since George W. Bush in 2004. Now, less than two years later, Democrats’ active-registration advantage has dwindled to almost nothing. This did not happen overnight. Back in 2022, The Gateway Pundit reported that Republicans had narrowed the Democrat advantage in Nevada by 3,395 registrations in just one month. In September 2024, The Gateway Pundit also reported that Democrats were suffering significant registration losses nationwide while Republicans and independent voters gained ground. Nevada was one of the clearest warning signs. The Gateway Pundit later reported that Aguilar’s office launched investigations into potential election-law violations following the 2024 election, including approximately 180 allegations involving possible double voting. The same office previously came under fire after a voter-history “glitch” caused some Nevadans’ unreturned presidential-primary ballots to appear as counted in the state’s online system. Officials insisted the problem did not affect the election results. Meanwhile, Nevada voters have sent an unmistakable message on election integrity. More than 73 percent of voters approved Question 7 in 2024, a proposed constitutional amendment requiring identification for in-person voting and identifying information for mail ballots. Nevadans must approve the measure again in November 2026 before it becomes part of the state Constitution. Secretary Aguilar’s office describes the latest voter-roll changes as ordinary maintenance. But imagine the media hysteria if a Republican secretary of state canceled or inactivated more than 315,000 registrations before another 50,000-voter decline, and the Democrat registration advantage collapsed at the same time. CNN and MSNBC would undoubtedly scream “voter suppression” around the clock. Instead, the corporate media are remarkably quiet. Whatever Democrats choose to call it, the numbers tell the story. Their advantage has plunged from approximately 87,000 voters around the 2020 election to only 672 today. President Trump carried Nevada in 2024. Republicans have erased the Democrats’ registration advantage. Nonpartisan voters now dominate the electorate. And nearly three-quarters of Nevadans have demanded voter identification. The old Harry Reid machine is crumbling. thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09…
26
A few days ago a long awaited court case revealed duplicate ballots were processed 8 days after the election by a Dominion voting rep in Ware Co. GA. The election board refused to talk about it, a lawsuit had to take place. Ask yourself why a Dominion rep had to add votes.
New: A Dominion Voting technician has been identified as the person scanning Ware County GA ballots eight days after the 2020 election without the knowledge of the Ware Chairman of the Board of Elections. This information was provided to me yesterday by the Ware BOE chairman and election supervisor in a boardroom meeting following the closure of Fulgham v Ware Co. BOE where I sued for an explanation of double scanned ballots. After an unusual flip in candidate totals following the Ware hand count in 2020, a news reporter interviewed Ware Supervisor of Elections Carlos Nelson and reported that Nelson stated that 100 ballots were scanned twice by a Ware employee by accident. In January 2024 I provided evidence to Ware officials showing 100 Ware ballots were scanned for the second time on 11-11-2020. The Chairman informed me he had no knowledge of ballots being scanned on that date. I was told that I would need to sue for an explanation. So I sued and brought Ware officials to court. I presented text message evidence showing the chairman had informed me he had no knowledge of ballots being scanned on 11-11-2020. On 9-22-2026 Judge Muldrew recommended that Ware officials meet with me and answer my questions. That's when both the supervisor of elections and the chairman first acknowledged that Batch 35 was indeed scanned on 11-11-2020 by a Dominion Voting technician. According to analyst Phillip Davis, Batch 35 is a identical double scanned copy of Batch 11, which had been scanned 8 days prior. I presented this and more evidence in Fulgham v Ware in filings and in court. Davis is a mathematician and computer scientist who also provided evidence of double scanned ballots in SEB case 2023-025, where his work was confirmed accurate by @GaSecofState attorneys and investigators in regards to 3000+ now confirmed Fulton double scanned ballots. He has now identified 8,000+ statewide from 2020 from limited records because most digital records were prematurely destroyed. At the boardroom meeting on 9-22-2026 Ware officials told me that the Dominion Voting technician told them that he scanned Batch 35 to correct an error. Always vote and always defend the integrity of our elections. 🇺🇸
1
2
49
If fontes is talking, he's lying !
2
19
Fontes needs to be prosecuted for interfering with our election. The people of Arizona have had enough of his treasonous actions. Vote @realAlexKolodin
1
19