@EleonoraDagiene@social.cwts.nl PhD candidate at CWTS, Leiden University l Research evaluation | Scholars, publishers, and policymakers
Lithuania
- Tweets 506
- Following 346
- Followers 271
- Likes 1,243
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
The Women in Science Policy Network (WISP) will be holding their second event at the upcoming @sti2023 conference in @cwtsleiden Leiden sti2023.org/the-women-in-sci…
9
15
1,323
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Grateful for the opportunity to share the equity research of the National Network for Critical Technology Assessment with @housescience @WHOSTP @NSF. Great discussions on who participates in and benefits from science and what we can do as a Nation to address disparities.
1
4
57
2,254
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Вільний переказ тез з @sti2023 від @EleoDag & Ko про перипетії встановлення 🇱🇹 наукової політики. Матеріал корисний не лише для полісімейкерів та наукометристів, а для усіх, хто вболіває за долю 🇺🇦: bit.ly/42Xtt1c #Lithuania #researchevaluation #internationalisation
4
6
175
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Check out my new article How Citizen Scientists See their Own Role and Expertise: An Explorative Study of the Perspectives of Beekeepers in a Citizen Science Project with Max Fochler & Robert Brodschneider
@UniGraz @STSvienna @CSAustria @_CitizenScience
theoryandpractice.citizensci…
1
5
13
1,113
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Важливий препринт від @EleoDag для тих, хто хотів дізнатися більше про #ISBN, але не мав до кого звернутися! У роботі представлено огляд як ISBN Manual та the Global Register of Publishers можна використати для визначення жанру та видавця книг 💡: doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/qpwx…
3
5
138
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Dear all. I am going to need some help here. Some SERIOUS retweeting effort. Apparently twitter deprioritises tweets from those who don’t have Blue subscription. God knows I tried to buy it, but couldn’t due to an unknown technical error. Now I am banned from from trying again 😅
1/22 This is Svetlana Maniovich. She is your guide to the world of extreme Russian glamour. She radiates richness. Diamonds, furs, Rolls Royces - she has it all and more. In summer you can find her in St Tropez where she rents a villa for €150k/month, or on a yacht in Naples🧵
52
990
2,545
323,620
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
This is a very engaging and informative read: “PNAS is Not a Good Journal” - by moin syed. HT @JessButler284 getsyeducated.substack.com/p…
1
6
25
14,637
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Opinion: Stop judging scholarly books by their publishers, by @EleoDag
researchprofessionalnews.com…
2
2
325
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Elated to find our book on #equity for #WomeninScience at the #AAASmtg! Eager to share it with the world! @lariviev @sppgatech @GeorgiaTech @UMontreal @Harvard_Press #AAAS2023
6
32
184
15,696
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
I never thought that the day would arrive that this would happen.
Twitter has just suspended the journal Scientific Reports for impersonating the journal Nature.
Community note
The account depicted in the screenshot is not the account for the Nature Portfolio journal "Scientific Reports." The correct handle is @SciReports.
twitter.com/SciReports
nature.com/srep/
128
861
6,901
following my supervisor 😊 #Mastodon easy to join @[email protected]
I have also moved to #Mastodon; feels quite exciting! @[email protected]
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
In September next year @cwtsleiden will organize the STI ENID 2023 conference in Leiden; this will be a hybrid event; we look forward to welcoming both virtual and on-site participants!
🗓️Save the date!🗓️
We are happy to say that we will host the STI ENID conference 2023 in the beautiful Stadsgehoorzaal in Leiden, 27-29 Sept.
We will launch a website with more information on submission and registration by the end of 2022.
cwts.nl/news?article=n-s2w2b…
12
25
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
It's been a great honor for me to be the first Editor-in-Chief of @QSS_ISSI; having served as Editor-in-Chief for 8 years, first at Journal of Informetrics and then at QSS, I'm going to look for new challenges; I look forward to transferring responsibility for QSS to a new team!
Excited to announce that we are looking for a new editorial team for our journal! Please send your application to the search committee of the ISSI society; applications are invited both from individuals and from teams
3
14
57
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Congratulations to @elife on their announcement of a new editorial process centered on preprints and preprint review. Here’s why we think it’s groundbreaking. 🧵
elifesciences.org/articles/8….
1
13
30
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Many important critical remarks by @tonyR_H on problems of APCs and predatory publishing and downsides of transformative agreements with large publishers; agree with Tony we need to move past the journal; this is the most promising way to address these problems @ScienceEurope
1
6
26
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
I've just learned that an institution that's listed in the @DORAssessment repository of research assessment reform resources for doing some really innovative stuff ALSO pays their departments a bonus for publishing in high impact factor journals. And now I feel a bit punch-drunk.
4
2
37
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
😱 Please make it stop.
research.com/scientists-rank…
ALT best female scientists in the world 2022 ranking.
3
7
60
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
"Two supporters of More Than Our Rank are even university rankers themselves. These are @cwtsleiden — home of the Leiden Ranking ... — and @UMultirank, an EU-funded initiative that aims to provide access to a broader range of institutional data than traditional rankings"
‘More Than Our Rank’ reaches the places that league tables can’t.
A worldwide initiative launching today will let universities celebrate their diversity, says @LizzieGadd.
researchprofessionalnews.com…
4
10
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
The art of marketing Swedish-style. How to support the Forces of Good in war and promote the name of your king.
🇺🇦🤝🇸🇪
Don't stop, dear Swedes. Ukraine still needs your support.
225
2,079
10,945
Eleonora Dagiene retweeted
Several studies on gender bias in science appeared recently. One study found that “men had about 14,000 more lifetime citations than women” and another that “women were 15 times more likely to be accepted into NAS”. science.org/content/article/…
They cannot both be gender biases.🧵
7
75
291