Co-Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Tim Engels; Prof. Liying Yang | IF: 2.7/Q2 CiteScore: 3.2/Q2 | Sponsored by National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China
- Tweets 250
- Following 1,072
- Followers 558
- Likes 356
JDIS is delighted to welcome Prof. Tim Engels of the University of Antwerp as our new Co-Editor-in-Chief. He is Director of Research Affairs & Innovation at the University of Antwerp and Head of ECOOM-Antwerp. He is internationally recognized for his work in research evaluation.
5
120
After a decade of dedicated service as Co-Editor-in-Chief since 2016, Prof. Ronald Rousseau will step down from the role and become Honorary Editor-in-Chief of JDIS at his own request. Under his leadership, JDIS was indexed by Scopus and WoS within just four years of its founding
1
7
107
JDIS held its 2026 Editorial Board Meeting at the University of Antwerp on September 8, on the eve of the STI Conference. The meeting was attended by Profs. Liying Yang, Ronald Rousseau, and Johan Bollen, along with editorial board members from several countries and regions.
1
2
92
Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Inverse Problems in Geophysics Using CiteSpace
Jiajia Liu, Hanyue Sun, Robin Haunschild
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
92
A Joint Multi-Task Learning Framework for Citation Intent and Citation Evaluation Classification
Yang Zhao, Guangyin Zhang
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
69
Diffusion and Citation Impact of Data-Driven Research in U.S. Higher Education: A Text Mining and Machine Learning Approach
Arielle J. King, Sayed A. Mostafa
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
1
206
A new JDIS study explores what happens after retracted research enters the patent system. Retraction reduces the likelihood of papers being cited by patents by about 66%. #ResearchIntegrity #Retraction #Patents #Innovation #ScienceOfScience degruyterbrill.com/document/…
70
Retracted papers aren't all equal—and their harm isn't either. JDIS New study of 50,000+ retracted WoS papers reveals: Citation inequality: top 20% capture 75% of all citations. degruyterbrill.com/document/… #ResearchIntegrity #Retractions
2
2
110
What we see in global citation indexes is not necessarily the full picture of scholarly publishing.
#ScholarlyPublishing #Bibliodiversity #OpenAlex #ResearchEvaluation #OpenScience #Bibliometrics #JDIS
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
88
How diverse are the journals we rely on for research evaluation? Do current journal lists adequately represent the global research landscape? j-jdis.com/EN/10.1515/jdis-2…
#ResearchEvaluation #ScienceOfScience #ResearchPolicy #JDIS
1
1
148
How “local” is local research? A new study in JDIS explores local research topics in the Flemish Social Sciences and Humanities and reveals that locality is far from a uniform concept. degruyterbrill.com/document/…
#Scientometrics #SSH #ResearchEvaluation #OpenScience #JDIS
1
1
70
Assessing the Performance of 8 AI Chatbots in Bibliographic Reference Retrieval: Grok and DeepSeek Outperform ChatGPT, but None are Entirely Accurate degruyterbrill.com/document/…
#ChatGPT #DeepSeek #Grok #ResearchIntegrity #Bibliometrics #ScienceOfScience #AcademicWriting #JDIS
1
1
216
A comprehensive analysis of retraction trends in Sub-Saharan Africa over the past 25 years. The findings reveal significant collaboration patterns and a growing crisis in research integrity. degruyterbrill.com/document/…
70
Not Just Large: Tall Teams Dominate East Asia's Scientific Production. Cultural factors, measured by Power Distance, as well as the observed funding patterns of major basic science agencies, are associated with the dominance of tall teams in East Asia. degruyterbrill.com/document/…
65
New ideas related to research funding and the associated peer review process. #Funding #PeerReview
degruyterbrill.com/document/…
Made with AI
1
1
130
JDIS Hot Article Alert
Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality? reference-global.com/article…
Evaluating research quality with Large Language Models: An analysis of ChatGPT’s effectiveness with different settings and inputs reference-global.com/article…
80
With great respect and appreciation, JDIS thanks all reviewers who contributed their expertise and time in 2025. #Reviewers
1
111
A global consensus guide for collecting and applying the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators, addressing barriers like inconsistent definitions and data challenges. Using Utstein methodology, the study offers a standardized toolkit.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2025-00…
72
A novel algorithm for evaluating scientific impact that goes beyond traditional citation counts by leveraging weighted heterogeneous scholarly networks — accounting for paper similarity, author output, and journal influence.
🔗 doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2025-00…
58