The Guardian makes an interesting point in reply, Senator, blowing your figures out of the water. In light of that, do you stand by your claim, or correct it? Thanking you.
I see a lot of people confused about just how land intensive solar and wind power is. This is from a report from Net Zero Australia that shows to get to net zero we could need 120,000 square km of land, or 12 million hectares in land for solar, wind and the associated transmission lines. Most of this land comes from freehold or leasehold farming land. This is one reason why farmers are mostly opposed to the large scale rollout of industrial wind and solar projects. Net Zero Australia say that this amount of land is "equivalent to over half the size of Victoria." It is also two times the size of Tasmania. Net Zero Australia is a consortium of the University of Melbourne, the University of Queensland, Princeton University and the Nous Group. They support the goal of net zero. I don't!

Aug 3, 2026 · 12:54 PM UTC

11
105
295
15,765
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
Holy hand grenade Peter. Do you mean 'Ole Blackface @mattjcan might be talking completely out of his arse as he regularly totally misrepresents data? Why might he lie about renewable costs? Anything to do with resources sector close association to @The_Nationals Never!
1
13
284
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
Maths seem to by LNP kryptonite. Angus Taylor was at the debate, the man who claimed Sydney City Council was spending - wait for it - $41,000 every day on airfares!
1
12
314
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
He is after all deliberately trying to deceive the public for partisan political and ideological ends. Not for Australia. He is Conavan.😱
1
8
153
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
Is this the same Senator Canavan that painted his face with coal, and cosplayed as a miner? That alone is enough to give him the title of clown 🤡, and lose all privileges of ever been taken seriously.
1
4
303
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
Matt Canavan is a liar, his agenda is use fossil fuels, he’s obviously being paid by the fossil fuel corporations
4
113
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
The figures I saw were, nationally 45,000 square kilometres would be taken up by panels, transmission lines etc, there are 200,000 square kilometres of arable land in NSW alone, so less than 1% would be taken up. Less than 1%.
4
252
New X bio: Senator Matt Canavan: ‘Plain wrong and plain silly’
2
152
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
He couldn’t lie straight in bed
2
108
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
Land use is set for a complete paradigm change, with new technologies like precision fermentation and artificial meat. Throw in insect farming, vertical farming etc. Cheap energy allowing road tunnels for wildlife corridors, vital for refuge seeking in a changing climate.
1
205
Replying to @Peter_Fitz
Total project area is not land lost. Wind turbines and access roads use about 1% of a site. The rest remains productive farmland.
35