This is extremely concerning. If Cambridge don’t understand their culpability in this awful affair extends far beyond the support, or lack thereof, they provided then they seriously misunderstand the problem. If Cambridge won’t properly look into this themselves then the OfS should.

Too young for war. Too young to die. Look into his eyes. This is what the Great War looked like for a generation of young British soldiers.

The daughter of a right-wing German publisher isn't allowed to become a teacher anywhere in Germany, simply because she's the daughter. The courts told her this after she graduated to become a teacher.

The world order is undergoing a turbulent transition to multipolarity; security competition has triggered wars and uncontrolled escalation in the Middle East and Europe - with a US-China conflict coming next; a pending economic crisis and untested new technologies will introduce even more uncertainty and unpredictability; international law is collapsing and diplomacy is being criminalised. However, the EU focus is on also criminalising sports and force the public share their hatred.

Apologies, but here's a somewhat sobering thought. It is a literal truth that the bloke in the foreground is entrusted with the survival of the British nation. While the bloke in the background is his trusted advisor on matters of foreign policy, and probably wants his job.

Over the last few days we’ve seen public figures, ‘journalists’ and politicians publicly deny that the English exist as a people. Not only is this an outrageous lie; it is genocidal rhetoric. Gregory Stanton’s Ten Stages of Genocide outline this clearly: “Denying the identity, history, or reality of a group is a primary mechanism used to facilitate, normalise, or retroactively defend mass crimes.” To use this sort of language about any other group of people would lead to prosecution and social ostracism, yet major public figures can espouse vile racism against the English with no consequence. We understand that seeing publicly elected figures who are supposedly meant to represent our interests using terms against the English, such as ‘mongrel’, is incredibly demoralising and dehumanising. But they are wrong. The English are a people. A people who innovated, conquered and helped forge the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen. We are Englishmen. We exist. And we are proud. The Wyvern Fellowship will always speak up for our people, because no one else will. Join us.

Alastair Crooke (@AWCrooke): Voting did not open the system. Romania’s election was cancelled until Brussels got the right name. Germany is still talking about banning the AfD. Young people cannot buy a house. Protest meets militarized police. The establishment has closed the exits. “Elections have not changed anything. They may ultimately change something in Germany. I think they will, but not quite yet, because they’re still thinking in Germany about how to ban the AfD from taking part in elections. Remember what happened to Romania when they had an election? It was just cancelled. It was cancelled until they went on and chose the right candidate for Brussels. We have destroyed most of the political bridges. So young people today can’t get a job. The prices of everything are beyond their reach. They can’t afford to buy a house, can’t afford to rent easily. So what are they going to do? If they protest? You’ve probably seen some of the rushes by the armed, militarized police. They just come in great swaths to attack protesters. There were examples of that just in the last days in France. Strong action against protest. If protest doesn’t work, if voting can’t change or reform the system, what is going to happen? Well, people increasingly are going to turn to violence. That’s, I think, sort of inevitable. It’s a pity, but people have lost all confidence, all trust, all sense of believing in the establishment—the European establishment or the Brussels establishment. They are being closed in and closed in, and there’s only one way out.” A system that cancels the vote and criminalizes protest has already abandoned republican government. The living standard is the other ballot. Brussels cannot print that either.

I think you meant to say 'God forgive'.

The man who lied to us about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction thinks he can lecture about ‘misinformation’ You couldn’t make up the hypocrisy!

Those who do step up and do their duty are discarded like a disposable resource.

It's probably nothing...

Coercive control victim?

What happens when you elevate a municipal mayor to the post of prime minister without consulting the electorate.

When you realise that comparing pork scratchings to scampi fries doesn’t cut it in world geopolitics.

So, you're saying that if a group of people choose to define themselves collectively in ethnic terms, that is racism? But if you seek to deny that ethnic group the right to so define their chosen identity, somehow that's not racist, that's enlightened? If, for example, the Maasai of Tanzania, the Ainu of Japan, the Dayak of Indonesia, or the Han of China, claim a similar right to define themselves as a group in ethnic terms, are they too racist? Or would you be racist if you were to deny them that right? Or does the essence of racism lie elsewhere, such as in an ethnically defined group's preference for associating with members of its own group? Or its preference to live by its own cultural rules, standards and practices rather than that of other ethnically defined groups? Finally, would something of unique value to the world be lost if the Maasai, or Ainu, the Dyak or the Han were to die out, and be replaced by other ethnic groups? And if so, would the same be true of the English?

So, you're saying that if a group of people choose to define themselves collectively in ethnic terms, that is racism? But if you seek to deny that ethnic group the right to so define their chosen identity, somehow that's not racist, that's enlightened? If, for example, the Maasai of Tanzania, the Ainu of Japan, the Dayak of Indonesia, or the Han of China, claim a similar right to define themselves as a group in ethnic terms, are they too racist? Or would you be racist if you were to deny them that right? Or does the essence of racism lie elsewhere, such as in an ethnically defined group's preference for associating with members of its own group? Or its preference to live by its own cultural rules, standards and practices rather than that of other ethnically defined groups? Finally, would something of unique value to the world be lost if the Maasai, or Ainu, the Dyak or the Han were to die out, and be replaced by other ethnic groups? And if so, would the same be true of the English?

When your clinical role changes from extending lives to terminating them, your attitude towards your patients will likely also change. Not necessarily for the better.

The proxy war is going terribly wrong, and in desperation, the reckless escalation is predictably coming. The British political-media establishment discusses the need to “lock a few people up”, mainly the “pro-Russian voices” who say they do not want to die for Burnham. Habeas corpus would also have to be suspended as Britain prepares for war with Russia.