Stop spelling it as 'Muslim.' Use moslem. They hate it with a passion.

Danny will be at Portsmouth crown court on September 29th . Danny is being remanded to prison . Bail refused . Outrageous

2 years inside for throwing a plastic bottle. As an epileptic - I’ve thrown fits with more violence than this guy. The most dangerous people are those with nothing to lose. How much more does the State want to take?

This is Tan Ikram, the lefty judge who denied @RealDannyTommo bail. He previously let Nigel Farage’s attacker go free, got a formal warning for liking a pro-Hamas post and refused to jail the anti-Semitic ‘paraglider’ girls. More #twotierjustice in the UK. 🇬🇧

A father of two children has been jailed after throwing a plastic bottle at the police and swearing at officers during the illegal migrant protest in Portsmouth. Sentenced to a two year prison sentence. The judge said it would act 'as a deterrent' Now, let me be abundantly clear. I do not believe that any violence against the police is acceptable. I also do not believe that a two year prison sentence is appropriate, particularly when we are allowing paedophiles and rapists to roam our streets because of a supposed lack of prison capacity. The BBC reports the man 'said he had found the bottle on the ground and was going to throw it into a nearby bush, but was angry and so threw it up into the air.' Reportedly, he told the officers to 'f*** off' and 'pointed aggressively' at them (ITV). I can understand the anger, to be honest. This was happening as illegal migrants were being ferried into his town. This sentence is unfair, unjust and morally wrong. Let's be honest about what has happened here. The establishment is making an example of this man to deter others from protesting. A two year sentence is absolutely outrageous - there are far better ways for him to make right the wrong. The third world invaders are greeted to luxury accommodation as heroes, yet this man will rot in prison. It's not right.

🚨 WANTED: Police are looking for this Tanned European after a woman reported being sexually assaulted by him in the Baker Street Underground station. He then slapped the victim in the face when she challenged him.

The monster on the left is illegal migrant Hadush Kebatu. He broke into our country on a small boat and after only 8 DAYS he sexually assaulted a 14yr-old girl and a woman. He was sentenced to 12 months. The man on the right is father of 2, Del Somerville. He threw a plastic bottle and swore at police. He was sentenced to TWO YEARS. Disgusting two-tier justice.

HOLD ON A MINUTE… WHO ACTUALLY OWNS THE BLOODY BOAT? They want to pursue Danny Tommo over alleged criminal damage. Fine. So let’s start with the obvious question. Who is going to come forward and say, “That’s my boat”? Who bought it? Who owns it? Where’s the paperwork? Who is claiming the damage? And what exactly is the alleged loss? Because surely you can’t have criminal damage without someone actually claiming that their property has been damaged. So I’m asking the question: WHO OWNS THE BOAT?

This is three stories today so far. It’s never “trans woman arrested for tax evasion”. It’s always something unfathomable like biting off ears and raping his own stepfather. 😱

🚨BREAKING🚨 One of the most prominent drag queens in Germany has been spared prison after being convicted of possessing child sexual abuse material for the second time. Mario Olszinski, who performed under the stage name "Jurassica Parka," was a well-known gay rights activist and was formerly appointed the "Queer Berlin Ambassador" for the city's Place2Be tourism campaign. Olszinski was charged after investigators found child sexual abuse material on his electronic devices during a search of his home in July of 2025. Olszinski was ultimately sentenced to ten months in prison, but the sentence has been suspended, meaning he will not spend any time behind bars so long as he complies with the court's conditions. This is the second time Olszinski has avoided prison after being convicted of possessing child sexual abuse materials. He was previously convicted in 2023 of distributing, acquiring and possessing child sexual abuse material and was sentenced to pay a fine of €11,200.

The loudest voices stoking fears about AI dangers have made tremendous headway in the past two weeks. AI technology has not taken some unexpected, dangerous turn, but the hype around it — propelled by what appears to be a well orchestrated PR campaign — has drummed up considerable fear. I worry that it represents a setback for our field. I have written frequently that fears of AI are overhyped. AI’s capabilities can be uncannily human-like and unpredictable, and it’s rational to worry when people who are directly involved express concerns. But I see the problems as a sign of the engineering work that ahead, rather than insurmountable barriers or the sky falling. AI technology continues to advance — which is a good thing! — but technical advances, poorly understood by the public, give those who seek to generate hype repeated opportunities to do so. First, I don’t see any step up in the risk of human extinction from AI compared to a few months ago. The theories about this remain the same fantastical, science fiction scenarios as a few months ago. The biggest change in AI risk is its cybersecurity capabilities — a topic which we should take seriously — but this, too, will not lead to the end of the world. The most notable recent event leading to increased fear was when an OpenAI team deployed an agent swarm that hacked into Hugging Face. Much of the popular press contained significant hype. For example, some publications reported that a swarm of 1,200 agents carried out the attack. While this was technically accurate, as I write this, I have about 1,300 processes running on my laptop. Yes, the ability to get large swarms of agents to work in parallel on a task is a significant technical advance, And, in computing, many processes run at the same time. So this shouldn’t be seen as some magical capability. Additionally, OpenAI’s buggy sandboxing and monitoring processes were key to enabling this incident. Fixing these bugs and putting in place improved monitoring would be appropriate fixes, not pausing AI. There are many well known ways to attack software systems. The main advantage of AI agents is that they are relentless. They will tirelessly try many tactics — and have the patience to chain vulnerabilities together — that previously would have taken an infeasible amount of human effort. But in the long term, I believe the advantage will lie with defenders (because they have more information with which to identify bugs, which they can fix), but the cyber-threat landscape has changed significantly. There are still bottlenecks to identifying and exploiting a vulnerability. AI agents still have to try a lot of things to see what works, and taking these actions takes time and might be detected by defenders. This is why, even though it is now easy to obtain versions of leading open weight models that have had their guardrails removed or weakened, so they will not refuse to try to execute cyber attacks, the world has not ended. I am also concerned about the anthropomorphization of AI in a lot of reporting, where LLMs and agents are unnecessarily treated as if they were people. If I wield a hammer, miss a nail, and accidentally dent the wall, it’s not the fault of the hammer. The problem lies in how I used the hammer. Similarly, if I prompt an agent and it hacks into someone else’s system, the responsibility lies with me, not the agent. Of course, we want to build systems that are as safe and predictable as possible. (For example, an unsafe hammer would be one whose head randomly flies off under normal use.) Today’s agentic systems are not predictable, but I see no reason why, by applying sound engineering practices, we won’t be able to make them extremely safe to use. One new element in the forecasts of AI-enabled doom is AI companies disclaiming responsibility for their own products. “I didn’t do it; my out-of-control agent did!” There’s a balance to be struck between the responsibility of the tool maker and the tool user, but when something goes wrong, let’s hold the people building and/or using the hammer responsible, rather than the hammer. (By the way, if you’re worried about AI bioweapon risk, David Bellamy has a great post on why this, too, is overhyped. Briefly, the bottleneck in building a bioweapon is not intelligence, but lab work and manufacturing.) Pausing AI progress will create much more harm than benefit. First, our adversaries will certainly not slow down. Second, engineering requires discovering problems empirically so we can fix them. If we pause AI by a decade, we will also delay finding and implementing safety engineering fixes by about the same duration. Of course, the incentive to stoke fears — for regulatory capture, to garner attention, or to make one’s technology seem more powerful — remains the same as before. Disclaiming responsibility is a new one. Taking a hard technical look at the actual risks however, I see little factual basis for the degree of fear that’s been stoked up. We still have hard research and engineering work ahead to improve AI safety, but the beneficial applications continue to vastly outweigh the risks, and we should keep building. [Original text (with links): deeplearning.ai/the-batch/is… ]

It’s so true - and now I can’t unsee it either

This photo smells of 1 wet animal, 1 cheese & 1 emotion/feeling. Go! (I’m going for wet goat, parmesan & inadequacy) 💋

When Roisin came out against these interventions, The Guardian's culture editor Laura Snapes wrote this about her. Will she now apologise?

You absolute bastards.

Dear @edsheeran You placed yourself in the NO WIN zone You will never placate the mob nor please everyone. It is a fools errand. Now they smell blood, they will hunt you until you swing from a tree. Stop apologising. Do not quit the tour. Stand. Sing. This too shall pass

Funny how there's been no more mention about the two coppers that were involved with the Henry nowak case. Watch it get swept under the carpet and they get away scot free

Yet people wonder why violent 3rd world Invaders control the streets. This Arse Nugget shouldnt be allowed nowhere near the Police service.

Today I went to @Revolut Canary Wharf office in London. Honestly, I felt helpless. Nearly $28,000 has been restricted since Aug 25. I can’t transfer it, withdraw it, or properly use it to invest. I went to their office because I genuinely didn’t know what else I could do. And I still came back with my account restricted. At some point, you just want access to your own money.