BREAKING: The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to resume its expanded voter citizenship verification program, which lets states use Social Security records to check voters' citizenship. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented.

Sep 25, 2026 · 3:40 PM UTC

650
3,833
16,542
1,299,966
The Court found that a 1996 federal law likely authorizes DHS to obtain citizenship information from other agencies despite federal privacy restrictions. It also found that the lower court's ruling interfered with lawful individualized voter checks ahead of the midterms.
16
165
1,462
36,397
Justice Jackson argues that the 1996 law does not override federal privacy protections. She warned that outdated Social Security records could cause eligible voters, particularly recently naturalized citizens, to lose their registrations or face additional requirements.
65
59
544
29,256
Read the ruling here: supremecourt.gov/opinions/25…
11
62
339
25,735
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @scotus_wire
Afcourse they did.
505
Replying to @scotus_wire
FINALLY a win for our side! 😇
129
Replying to @scotus_wire
Yes!! If we do not have faith in our elections, we no longer have a country!! The voter rolls MUST be cleaned!!
24
Replying to @scotus_wire
It's about time someone in government got off the shitter!
48
Replying to @scotus_wire
Leftists' heads are exploding
740
Replying to @scotus_wire
Finally some common sense on voter integrity.
20
Replying to @scotus_wire
This is what careful constitutional reasoning looks like. Well done!
88
Replying to @scotus_wire
That is great news for American voters integrity.
101
Replying to @scotus_wire
🚫⚖️💭💭💭💭💭💭 cc @SCOTUSblog
1
1
116
Well, that was so nice of them. 🙄
55
Replying to @scotus_wire
Our attorney general is AWESOME
43
Replying to @scotus_wire
The voter rolls should be zeroed out to start fresh. And it should happen regularly @SpeakerJohnson @gop @WhiteHouse
1
333
Replying to @scotus_wire
The three dissenting justices seem to be three women but just one brain. Is there any votes where they disagree?
62
Replying to @scotus_wire
Of course they did!
9
Replying to @scotus_wire
So will California New York and other blue states even do this. That’s where the cheating is
12
Replying to @scotus_wire
The senate is worst than a joke. It's an enemy of the people. I will not listen to excuses of why it's not your fault. I vote or don't vote for two senators. No SAVE, no 2 legimate votes for both of you.
269
Replying to @scotus_wire
Why do these liberal justices treat the law like a political pulpit? They're an embarrassment- just like the liberal press. Do they get paid by someone to behave like idiots? What else could it be?
13
Replying to @scotus_wire
That's right. Trust BUT VERIFY
4
Replying to @scotus_wire
Thank you Scotus !
10
Replying to @scotus_wire
Sensible move.
58
Replying to @scotus_wire
F*ck the leftist "justices".
1
103
Replying to @scotus_wire
Excellent! Big SCOTUS win for safer elections.
1
927
Replying to @scotus_wire
Finally, common sense wins at the Supreme Court.
71
Replying to @scotus_wire
We'll fix this as soon as we impeach & imprison all Nazis.
8
Replying to @scotus_wire
The three anti-American domestic terrorist dissenters need to be removed. I mean, we've got effing lifetime Supreme Court Lefty activist effing "judges"???😠😡🤬
16
Replying to @scotus_wire
What happened to “the states set the rules for elections in tat state”? These freaks need to go.
99
Replying to @scotus_wire
All three dissented because they don’t like TRUMP.
25
Replying to @scotus_wire
That's NOT what this says, and where's the rest?
49
Replying to @scotus_wire
So the federal government is ALLOWING the federal government to use it's own data to check against corrupted voter rolls. How can you be against that?
1
31
Replying to @scotus_wire
Democrat liberals are a cancer on society
5
Replying to @scotus_wire
This is a good start but it's been reported that noncitizens have been issued Social Security numbers.
20
Replying to @scotus_wire
Why would any justice be against this. Doesn’t make sense unless they want illegal votes. Oh wait @TheDemocrats appointed justices voted what this. Figures.
1
170