Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Thirteen. "Designing a new, better, fairer system." You've been Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary for three weeks Helen. You've posted thirteen times about disabled people. You've published: Policy documents: 0 White papers: 0 Consultation drafts: 0 Costings: 0 Mechanisms: 0 Timelines: 0 Thirteen posts. Zero publications. "Designing" a system. WHERE? Show us. Publish it. Put a document on the table. Let the IFS cost THAT instead of just citing their critique of the current system as if critique equals solution. The IFS shines a light. Good. Light is useful. But you're standing in the light pointing at the problem. Not fixing it. Thirteen times now. Pointing. Every day. Same problem. Same light. No tool in your hand. A mother in your thread yesterday told you her daughter has attempted suicide multiple times. That she dreads ambulance sirens. That your words contribute to the stigma that makes her daughter feel like a burden. You posted number thirteen the next morning. "Better and fairer." For whom? Publish it. Cost it. Let disabled people and their carers READ what you're designing. Let the IFS audit your PROPOSAL not just your criticism. Let Scope and Disability Rights UK examine your mechanisms. Until then, thirteen posts is thirteen complaints. Not thirteen solutions. And the people reading them the 4 million on PIP, the carers, the parents, the families deserve more than a daily reminder that you think their support is the problem. builduk.club welfare charter. Published. Costed. Before your first post. Still waiting for yours.
3
26
105
1,694
You Tories created the PIP system that we have now and had 14yrs to do something about it.
1
1
64
493
Helen, the IFS also said disabled people aren’t getting enough financial support. You didn’t know that before posting this, clearly. Also finding out you’re actually a millionaire and this whole punching down act is to stave off a measly 2% wealth tax on your assets. Pathetic
2
8
55
352
Another day and yet another attack upon disabled people by expenses queen Whately. You are fixated on ensuring disabled people are targeted by bigots. You would have been championing the Aktion T4 program in the 30's
1
11
51
448
If the tories had their way, you’d cull disabled people.
3
1
65
622
Hi @Helen_Whately, are you saying that the PIP budget is too small, because people with the highest severity of disability aren't getting more money than the next highest severity? Or are you saying that Tories were wrong to scrap Middle Rate Care of DLA, when creating PIP?
4
27
227
Remember you can report @helen_whately to Parliamentary Standards for repeatedly posting misleading information, false and discriminatory comments to cause hate and division against sick and disabled people. PIP is not an out if work benefit!
6
24
233
We know your systems. Send people back to Care Homes to die or give them austerity to die slowly. No remorse,no apology because they just don't matter to you or the Conservatives.
1
1
33
224
Helen Whately is a millionaire. She also claims the most than other MPs. Including £39k a rent paid for by us. Her bills, her council tax, her travel expenses, her subsidised food & drink. But Helen wants you to believe disabled people on an average of £15k a year are the issue
1
7
33
812
If you remember, the Tories introduced PIp to replace DLA. DLA recipients are still being moved to PIP (many losing all support )
2
4
25
203
That's not 'a failure' it the fact there are only 2 levels of PIP in two different sections. Low and High Care and Mobility Who designed it like that? The Conservative Party. You could add more levels, but the you add even more complexity to the decision making process.
1
20
215
A fairer disability system- have I heard that before? Oh yes, the Tories; it implies that everybody will be worse off. The Tories regurgitate the same cruel policies. Always preying on the same unfortunate people. The Cruel Party.
1
2
15
197
You'll literally just say anything at this stage, won't you? Like words have no meaning any more.
17
270
More evidence of the failures of the conservative party ⬇️
1
15
302
That would be PIP which was the brainchild of Iain Duncan Smith. Introduced in 2013. So the Conservatives are offering to rescue us from the policy that they themselves introduced just 13 years ago. Fuckwits.
1
16
116
That’s because the Tories designed it that way. There are actually 8 successful award possibilities, ranging from £30.30 per week to £194.60 per week. By contrast there are (and so were for all before PIP was brought in) 11 possible awards for DLA.
1
11
123
By better and fairer you mean cheaper though don't you?
1
11
95
Wasn’t it tories who introduced pip with the Lib Dem’s? All you Mp’s are doing is lying and spreading misinformation regarding pip and disabilities. You NEVER make it clear it’s an in or out of work benefit, you NEVER state it’s not based on diagnosis but HOW your disability affects a person. you NEVER state pip has the LOWEST fraud rate of any benefit, also NEVER state how much medical evidence a person has to provide plus an assessment prior to getting a decision . WHY?
1
3
6
107
Why not focus on the tax dodgers instead of harassing the disabled who have to struggle every day 😡
3
8
67
Helen, the IFS hasn’t proved PIP has “failed”. It has pointed out that PIP has two payment rates and asked whether there should be more levels. That’s a debate about how PIP is designed — not evidence that the benefit itself has failed. Quite an important difference.
1
3
14
135
You wouldn’t recognise fairer if it was right in front of you. And until you all apologise properly for the absolute mess you’ve made you’ll continue to languish and be irrelevant.
10
108
Misleading rage-bait. The IFS didn’t say PIP had “failed” or endorse Tory reforms. It highlighted trade-offs: their alternative could cut some disabled people’s support by £1,720 a year.
1
11
190
Listen Whately, you need to be on the wrong side of this PIP system! 2 and a half hour grillings at assessment centres!!! Sick of people like you thinking you know better than us poor bastards that get sucked in and spat out by it! PIP is not easy to get
2
6
62
You don’t know what fair means you hypocrite! How much have you claimed from taxpayers for that second home?
10
76
Sorry wasn’t it the @Conservatives who introduced the 2 bandings - high and low rate care and high and low rate mobility? You couldn’t make this up 😂
9
76
Nobody has Exactly the same difficulty dealing with the environment that disables them! If my non-driving doppleganger lived in the country with no family we would have complexly different needs
1
10
120
I have read the report. It again makes the mistake of trying to divide up different disabilities by a ranking system. Helen PIP isn't awarded for the diagnosis it's for how it effects you on a day to day basis. The report talks as if everyone gets the higher rate. They don't.
2
7
114
Oh Helen, What short memory you have. Have you had a cognitive test? It was your government that changed the rules. The last of the DLA caseload are moving to PIP. See your problem? The shit system is fully your party’s fault!
1
4
119
Considering PIP was the tories idea and you had 14 years to make it that way. What hapoened?
6
102
No they don’t . There are two different levels
1
7
103
A millionaire that we pay £98,000 a year, who claims £39,000 a year for accommodation, activley promoting making the disabled poorer and life harder for them. Helen isn't a good, decent or nice person. Don't be like Helen
1
2
28