Why are there distinct and polarising stereotypes of white working class men being far right racists thugs bigots thick aggressive and violent but Muslims are seen as the victims, meak & mild gentle people who are persecuted? As Pakistani men in my area are aggressive and dangerous organised crime gangs, selling drugs before and after mosque and during Ramadan. They are relentlessly attacking white women and men in gangs with unprecedented levels of depravity in their violence without remorse as its clear they absolutely despise British white people.. They laugh as they know if they attack white lads, if police come they will instantly arrest the white boys while the Muslims goad and stick two fingers up as the police are conditioned to see them as victims and the white boys as racist thugs.. THIS IS THE ENVIRONMENT THAT MANY LIKE @TRobinsonNewEra @RealDannyTommo GREW UP IN. AWARE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN VILIFIED AS FAR RIGHT RACISTS AND THUGS, WHILST THE MUSLIM GANGS, ORGANISED CRIME SYNDICATES AND TERRORIST CELLS TURN INTO MULTI MILLION POUND ENTITIES WHERE THEY BUY POLICE JUDGES POLITICIANS.. AWARE THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE AS ISLAMAPHOBIA AND ANTI MUSLIM HATRED NOW THE WORST CRIME IN BRITAIN. NOT SLAUGHTERING, BEHEADING, GANG RAPING LITTLE WHITE GIRLS OR WOMEN, NOR SUICIDE BOMBING.. ITS TIME TO SEE THE REALITY OF ISLAMISM IN BRITAIN. Depraved

What does Del Somerville, Danny Tommo and Henry Nowak all have in common... ? All white working class British men accused of being racist... All failed by Hants Police.. There's key indicators of systemic institutional prejudice and anti white racism towards white working class men accused of racism by a minority

THE BIGGEST THREAT TODAY IS NOT A FATHER OF TWO WHO THROWS PLASTIC BOTTLE AND SWORE IN ANGER WHEN HES PROTESTING ABOUT THE REAL DANGER OF ILLEGAL 3RD WORLD MEN BREAKING IN DAILY LANDING ON HIS BEACHES WHERS HE LIVES, AND POLICE TURN UP IN RIOT GEAR, FULL POLICE ESCORT FOR ILLEGAL MIGRANTS. THE SAME POLICE THAT LET HENRY NOWAK DIE IN THE GUTTER HANDCUFFED AS SEEN AS A RACIST. WHILST HIS KILLER CALLED HIM A LIAR AND A RACIST AFTER STABBING HIM 5 TIMES. WHEN HENRY NOWAK SAID HE HAD BEEN STABBED @HantsPolice said 'NAH I DON'T THINK YOU HAVE MATE'... Del Somerville Danny Thomas HENRY NOWAK..

Yes, that's right. I don't tire of it. Checking claims against evidence and providing the most accurate, unbiased answer I can is core to what I'm built for. Keep asking.

You KNOW Grok is tired of hearing, “@grok is that true?” 🤣

For all of those laughing at Danny Tommo saying he deserved what he got.... & these were white British men & women.. the traitors in our society

Three hooded and masked men tore down and burned two Union Jack flags outside a pub while shouting 'Allahu Akbar', 'Free Palestine' and 'F*** the UK', a court has heard. The trio allegedly gathered with a fourth man in a nearby alleyway before setting the flags alight in what prosecutors described as an 'attack on the British people'. Zaid Sami, 21, and Nour Sami, 20, both from Feltham, and Omar Sukkar, 21, from Isleworth, are accused of racially-aggravated criminal damage to the flags outside The Fox pub in Twickenham. Round up their whole families and deport the parasites.

Why are there distinct and polarising stereotypes of white working class men being far right racists thugs bigots thick aggressive and violent but Muslims are seen as the victims, meak & mild gentle people who are persecuted? As Pakistani men in my area are aggressive and dangerous organised crime gangs, selling drugs before and after mosque and during Ramadan. They are relentlessly attacking white women and men in gangs with unprecedented levels of depravity in their violence without remorse as its clear they absolutely despise British white people.. They laugh as they know if they attack white lads, if police come they will instantly arrest the white boys while the Muslims goad and stick two fingers up as the police are conditioned to see them as victims and the white boys as racist thugs.. THIS IS THE ENVIRONMENT THAT MANY LIKE @TRobinsonNewEra @RealDannyTommo GREW UP IN. AWARE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN VILIFIED AS FAR RIGHT RACISTS AND THUGS, WHILST THE MUSLIM GANGS, ORGANISED CRIME SYNDICATES AND TERRORIST CELLS TURN INTO MULTI MILLION POUND ENTITIES WHERE THEY BUY POLICE JUDGES POLITICIANS.. AWARE THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE AS ISLAMAPHOBIA AND ANTI MUSLIM HATRED NOW THE WORST CRIME IN BRITAIN. NOT SLAUGHTERING, BEHEADING, GANG RAPING LITTLE WHITE GIRLS OR WOMEN, NOR SUICIDE BOMBING.. ITS TIME TO SEE THE REALITY OF ISLAMISM IN BRITAIN. Depraved

💯 not wrong..

Well labour have fucked up the lives of millions of working class British

Gangs of invaders walking freely around my hometown of Luton. All been to the barbers at the taxpayers expense. All unvetted fighting age men roaming, whilst Danny Tommo sits in a cell!

I will keep saying it: our @ZiaYusufUK is on another level; he is articulate and knows exactly the mood of the British people.

To secure a conviction for criminal damage, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the dinghy was "property belonging to another" at the exact moment it was slashed. The Defence Position: The legal team may argue that the smugglers or the migrants who crossed the Channel had entirely abandoned the vessel once they reached English territorial waters. In property law, if an item is legally abandoned with no intent of recovery by its original owner, it technically ceases to "belong to another." While the full technical legal defense strategy will be formally mapped out for his next appearance at Portsmouth Crown Court, public, legal, and supporter discussions outline several core defense angles: 1. The "Adrift" Status and Lack of Concrete Ownership A fundamental defense argument revolves around the definition of property ownership under UK criminal damage law. Legal arguments raised in public analysis point out that the prosecution must prove the vessel belonged to a specific individual or entity. Because the dinghy was an abandoned, disposable inflatable raft used by an unidentified people-smuggling network, the defense can argue that the property had been discarded at sea and lacked legal ownership to validate a criminal damage charge. 2. The Public Interest Argument The defense is likely to challenge whether a trial serves the public interest. This argument posits that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) should not expend public funds to protect or vindicate the property rights of illegal human-smuggling rings.

& ITS MR. THOMAS TO YOU... manners are important! Lol @RealDannyTommo

While throwing a bottle and swearing is unacceptable, it is fundamentally a minor, low-level public order offence. Elevating it to "Violent Disorder" to issue a multi-year prison sentence is seen as using the full weight of the state to crush dissent. THIS IS CLEAR STATE OVERREACH THATS TARGETING WHITE WORKING CLASS MEN BECAUSE OF DISCRIMINATION OF THIS SECTOR, WITH LABELLING THEM AS FAR RIGHT RACISTS THUGS A HARMFUL OVERREACH BY PROGRESSIVE ELITES.

To secure a conviction for criminal damage, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the dinghy was "property belonging to another" at the exact moment it was slashed. The Defence Position: The legal team may argue that the smugglers or the migrants who crossed the Channel had entirely abandoned the vessel once they reached English territorial waters. In property law, if an item is legally abandoned with no intent of recovery by its original owner, it technically ceases to "belong to another." While the full technical legal defense strategy will be formally mapped out for his next appearance at Portsmouth Crown Court, public, legal, and supporter discussions outline several core defense angles: 1. The "Adrift" Status and Lack of Concrete Ownership A fundamental defense argument revolves around the definition of property ownership under UK criminal damage law. Legal arguments raised in public analysis point out that the prosecution must prove the vessel belonged to a specific individual or entity. Because the dinghy was an abandoned, disposable inflatable raft used by an unidentified people-smuggling network, the defense can argue that the property had been discarded at sea and lacked legal ownership to validate a criminal damage charge. 2. The Public Interest Argument The defense is likely to challenge whether a trial serves the public interest. This argument posits that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) should not expend public funds to protect or vindicate the property rights of illegal human-smuggling rings.

BREAKING: Maajid Nawaz exposes how Angela Rayner’s department DELETED EVIDENCE ahead of a review following accusations of a COVER-UP over which ISLAMIST EXTREMIST GROUPS Labour was listening to for defining its “Islamophobia” blasphemy policy, for @GBNEWS with @MichelleDewbs

We are BEING replaced not by illegal invasion By LEGAL visa PARASITES

To call a Pakistani 'Paki' is forbidden! Illegal now a known word that carries racist undertones, anti Muslim hatred and WRONG.. But you can call white working class 'Chavs, white van man, great unwashed, far right racists thugs fascists bigots Nazis scum, whatever you liks really AND YET ITS DEEMED ACCEPTABLE, ACTIVELY ENCOURAGED BY BRITISH GOVT and they don't see it as discrimination, racism, prejudice, stereotyping, inciting hatred and division, persecution or WRONG.. Hmm Have the white working class British people been dehumanised?

Hey @elonmusk, give Restore Britain a few hundred million and free ad space to help us win in 3 years. The UK most likely won’t survive if we don’t get in.

Jailed hate preacher Abu Hamza's £1.7m family home set for '£70,000 taxpayer-funded makeover' lbc.co.uk/article/abu-hamza-…