Great news!
Nature expands Registered Reports to all fields it publishes: nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
RRs aim to:
• mitigate publication bias
• improve research quality
• guard against questionable research practices
• address limits of standard preregistration
#openscience
ALT Image of linked Nature article, announcing that Nature is expanding Registered Reports to all the fields in which they publish. Registered Reports are an academic publishing format which aim to: a) improve research quality, 2) mitigate publication bias, 3) guard against questionable research practices, and 4) address weaknesses with standard preregistration.
Call for Proposals: Metascience 2025 @OSFramework
Be part of the biggest Metascience meeting yet! We're inviting proposals for:
✅ Virtual symposia
✅ In-person panels
✅ Talks & posters
⏰ Submit by 7 Feb 2025
🔗 Full details: metascience.info/call-for-pr…
BREAKING: A judge has dismissed the defamation suit brought against Data Colada by Francesca Gino, the Harvard Business School professor whose studies were found to contain fraud. (Some of her claims against Harvard will be allowed to continue in court.) chronicle.com/article/she-su…
Gino's case against us has been dismissed.
Scientists cannot effectively sue other scientists for exposing fraud/errors in their work.
Those who work to correct the scientific record can sleep better tonight. Those who don’t want it corrected, well, I don’t care how they sleep.
ALT Abstract
The replication crisis revealed high levels of bias and questionable research practices (QRPs) in psychology research. Registered Reports (RRs) have been increasingly adopted as a possible solution, but there has been relatively little evidence of whether this novel publishing format appears to be working as intended to reduce bias and QRPs. This project sought to build a detailed database of RRs and closely matched standard reports (SRs), to investigate whether RRs perform better than SRs on indicators of quality, rigour, and transparency.
New paper: The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports, with Cristian Mesquida, @sajedeh_rasti and former lab visitor Max Ditroilo. We provide a state-of-the-art overview of the metascience on preregistration and Registered Reports. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.… >
Chapter 5 of my book "A Student's Guide to Open Science: Using the Replication Crisis to Reform Psychology" is now open access via PsyArXiv!
This chapter is arguably the most important: a hands-on guide to implementing open science in your workflow!
osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/2t…
📢 Have you authored or reviewed a Registered Report?
✏️ Please give feedback about your experience (takes 5-10mins):
registeredreports.cardiff.ac…
📊 So far authors & reviewers have given 367 pieces of feedback across 75 journals - see our dashboards!
#OpenScience#PeerReview
ALT Screenshot of main website dashboard, listing journals which offer (or have offered) the Registered Reports manuscript format. Author/reviewer ratings across the speed and quality categories are aggregated, allowing website users to sort by either category.
Tor Browser 13.0.15 is now available from the Tor Browser download page and also from our distribution directory. It includes important security updates to Firefox. 🔽📰 blog.torproject.org/new-rele…
📢Announcing 2 new PCI RR-friendly journals!
The 1st is diamond-OA journal Personality Science, covering all areas in personality research rr.peercommunityin.org/about…
The 2nd is First Language, which covers research in children's language development rr.peercommunityin.org/about…
ALT Statement of commitment: Personality Science will automatically offer Stage 1 in-principle acceptance (IPA) to any Stage 1 RR within the journal’s disciplinary scope that receives IPA at PCI RR, and will accept without further peer review any Stage 2 RR that has been recommended by PCI RR, subject to the manuscript falling within the journal's annual publication quota.
Disciplinary scope: Research in all areas of personality research, including personality psychology as well as adjacent fields such as genetics, anthropology, sociology, computer science, economics, educational science, medicine, and political science. Scope includes studies examining differences between and within individuals or groups of individuals in biological, psychological, and social origins, expressions, structures, dynamics, processes, mechanisms, functioning, development, and consequences, as well as non-pathological and pathological individual differences between and within humans, animals, virtual avatars
ALT Statement of commitment: First Language will automatically offer Stage 1 in-principle acceptance (IPA) to any Stage 1 RR within the journal’s disciplinary scope that receives IPA at PCI RR, and will accept without further peer review any Stage 2 RR that has been recommended by PCI RR, subject to the manuscript meeting the applicable journal requirements concerning bias control and formatting.
Disciplinary scope: Research on children's language development from across a range of disciplinary perspectives, including psychology, linguistics, anthropology, cognitive science, neuroscience, communication, sociology and education. Note that studies on reading development where the focus is on children's development of code-based skills rather than language per se, and studies on language teaching, are not within the disciplinary scope.
Online talk I gave to Purdue now online:
"Registered Reports and Peer Community in Registered Report are the future of science:
Sharing our experience from over 25 Replication and extensions Registered Report submissions"
Video:
piped.video/watch?v=XTFGR8CM…
Tor Browser 13.0.13 is now available from the Tor Browser download page and also from our distribution directory. 🔄 This is an unscheduled emergency release with important security updates to Firefox for Desktop platforms. Android is unaffected.
blog.torproject.org/new-rele…
New preprint: The Benefits of Preregistration and Registered Reports. This is an opinionated piece summarizing the arguments for preregistration, reviewing the metascientific evidence, and engaging with criticism. doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dqap… >