If you follow rent regulation and Takings Clause litigation, the attached tracker reviews 18 key current and precedential cases. It shows where each case stands, what it challenges, which groups are involved, the procedural barriers, the next expected event, and what could change if the owners prevail.
Large national and state housing associations participated in several of these cases, primarily by filing supporting briefs. The California Apartment Association went further, bringing its own case against Alameda County.
One result is especially pleasing:
@TheRealSPONY or its members brought two of the three live cases in the tracker that directly challenge rent rules now in force.
Small Property Owners of New York v. City of New York challenges limits on rents for vacant, rent-stabilized apartments. SPONY is the named plaintiff, represented by the Institute for Justice.
Kenilworth Holdings v. NYC Rent Guidelines Board, brought by owners including SPONY members, challenges New York City’s 2026 rent freeze and the process used to impose it.
The third direct challenge is Harris v. City of Los Angeles.
For an all-volunteer group, this is a remarkable record.
@amkorchak and SPONY deserve real credit for finding the issues and plaintiffs, building the cases, and bringing the concerns of small housing providers before the courts. -
tinyurl.com/SCOTUS-RS